top of page
Writer's pictureArya Shinde

The Upcoming J&K Elections: Any Winners Here?

An Introduction

The upcoming elections in Jammu and Kashmir are set to be a significant political event for India, marking the first assembly elections since the abrogation of Article 370 in August 2019. With the region's special status revoked, Jammu and Kashmir has undergone substantial administrative and political changes, but the upcoming polls will be a major test of the Modi government’s handling of the situation, the local political landscape, and the future of the region.

Pre-Article 370 Era

For decades, Jammu and Kashmir’s political scene has been dominated by regional parties, mainly the National Conference and the People’s Democratic Party, who traditionally supported autonomy for the region under Article 370. However, with the abrogation, these parties have been pushed to the sidelines as they were vehemently opposed to the Modi led government’s decision to revoke Jammu and Kashmir's semi autonomous status. The parties have since regrouped, forming alliances like the Gupkar Alliance to restore Article 370. Their narrative hinges on the protection of Kashmiri identity and autonomy.

However, BJP has made inroads, especially in the Jammu region, and aims to consolidate its vote bank further. The upcoming elections will show whether this push has yielded the desired results for the party, particularly as it eyes more than just the Jammu region for its influence.


The Modi Government and Jammu & Kashmir

Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the BJP government has positioned itself as having "resolved" the Kashmir issue by abrogating Article 370 and bifurcating the state into two Union Territories Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. The government’s rhetoric suggests that removing the region’s special status would lead to greater integration, development, and peace. However, the results on the ground are complex and mixed.


In many ways, Modi’s vision for Jammu and Kashmir appears more centralizing, with a shift toward directly controlling the region from New Delhi. In theory, this should bring developmental benefits, but the actual gains have been unevenly distributed. Critics argue that Modi's government has failed to address the core political aspirations of the Kashmiri people and is instead relying on a heavy handed security apparatus to maintain order.

The Opposition’s Stand

The Gupkar Alliance, led by the NC’s Farooq Abdullah and PDP’s Mehbooba Mufti, is framing the elections as a referendum on Article 370. While these parties have boycotted earlier elections post-abrogation, they now seem intent on contesting, recognizing the need to regain political relevance. Their main political plank is the restoration of autonomy, promising that they will continue to push for the reinstatement of Article 370.


This anti-BJP alliance remains a formidable force, especially in the Kashmir Valley. However, its narrative is not without its weaknesses. It is perceived by some as being overly focused on the past, offering little in terms of a forward-looking agenda or economic development for the region.


Development vs. Autonomy

The crux of the upcoming elections will likely revolve around a few key issues: the demand for autonomy, the economic situation, and the broader question of development. The BJP will undoubtedly run on a platform emphasizing development and economic reforms, positioning itself as the party that can bring modernization to Jammu and Kashmir. In contrast, the regional parties will frame the election as a fight for preserving the unique identity of Jammu and Kashmir.


In recent years, Jammu and Kashmir has seen infrastructural development in the form of new roads, power projects, and educational institutions. However, unemployment remains high, tourism has declined in the Valley, and political uncertainty continues to hamper large scale investment. The elections will serve as a referendum on the Modi government’s claim of development and stability in the region.

The Role of Security and Militarization

The security situation remains a significant factor in any electoral calculus for Jammu and Kashmir. The central government has taken a hardline approach with a heavy military presence, extensive crackdowns on separatist elements, and significant curbs on internet access and civil liberties in the Valley.


There is also the ongoing issue of political prisoners and curfews. These heavy handed tactics have alienated large sections of the Kashmiri populace, particularly in the Valley, where a sense of disenfranchisement runs deep. This discontent is fertile ground for the NC, PDP, and other regional parties to mobilize voters.


At the same time, the BJP will try to sell the hardline approach as necessary to combat terrorism and bring lasting peace. The question is whether the electorate will respond to this message or view it as an extension of repression that has only deepened the region’s woes.


Jammu: BJP's Trump Card?

Jammu has emerged as a significant political base for the BJP in the region. Since 2014, the BJP has successfully built a strong voter base, primarily on issues of national security, Hindutva, and economic development. The abrogation of Article 370 was widely popular in Jammu, where many felt that the special status of Kashmir had long been an impediment to

their own development and progress.


The upcoming elections will likely see the BJP focus heavily on Jammu, where they aim to consolidate their gains and increase their seat share. Their campaign will likely focus on nationalistic themes, with an emphasis on the abrogation of Article 370 as a decisive, patriotic action.


However, there are local grievances that the BJP must address, including issues of unemployment, lack of infrastructure in certain areas, and dissatisfaction with governance. Additionally, Jammu’s dominance in the political discourse has also raised some concerns about alienation in Kashmir, which the BJP will need to carefully navigate.

Ladakh and the Sixth Schedule

Ladakh was carved out as a separate Union Territory from Jammu and Kashmir in 2019. While this move was initially welcomed by the Ladakhi people, especially in the Buddhist majority Leh, the situation has evolved in the past few years. There is growing concern among the locals regarding the protection of their land, culture, and identity in the absence of political representation or autonomy.


One of the key demands now emerging in Ladakh is for the region to be included under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. This schedule provides for greater autonomy to tribal areas in terms of land and resource management, and Ladakh's predominantly tribal population sees it as a way to protect their interests. The demand has gained significant traction, with local leaders and civil society groups pushing for it to safeguard their rights.


The Modi government’s response to this demand has been mixed. On one hand, it recognizes the need to address the concerns of Ladakh's people, but on the other, there has been a reluctance to grant this special status. After all, the very act of revoking Article 370 was to eliminate special privileges. Offering Ladakh the Sixth Schedule would appear contradictory to that broader objective.


Yet, Ladakh remains a strategically important region, especially given its proximity to the border with China. Ignoring its demands could have broader geopolitical consequences. The BJP will likely have to find a way to address this issue in the elections without seeming to undermine its broader narrative on Jammu and Kashmir.


Electoral Predictions

While predicting election outcomes in a region as politically volatile as Jammu and Kashmir is risky, the elections are expected to be a close contest between the BJP and the Gupkar Alliance in the Kashmir Valley, with the BJP holding a significant advantage in Jammu. In Ladakh, the elections will likely serve as a referendum on whether the Sixth Schedule demand is addressed by New Delhi.


The BJP’s success will hinge on its ability to present itself as the party of stability, development, and national unity. However, it will face stiff opposition from those who believe that the revocation of Article 370 has done more harm than good.


Meanwhile, the regional parties, especially the Gupkar Alliance, will need to mobilize their voter base effectively to regain the influence they’ve lost post-abrogation. Their call for the restoration of autonomy resonates strongly in the Valley but has limited appeal in Jammu and Ladakh, where the benefits of the abrogation are perceived more favorably.

Conclusion

The upcoming Jammu and Kashmir elections will serve as a major test for both the Modi government and the regional political establishment. For Modi, this election will be a referendum on his administration’s handling of Kashmir, particularly the abrogation of Article 370. While the BJP will push its agenda of development and national security, the elections will also reveal the level of dissatisfaction among the Kashmiri population with New Delhi’s policies.


Ladakh’s demand for Sixth Schedule status adds another layer of complexity, with the central government walking a tightrope between addressing local concerns and maintaining its broader narrative of equality and integration for all Indian regions. As Jammu and Kashmir moves toward elections, the political landscape remains as fragmented and complex as ever. 


Regardless of the outcome, the elections will provide a clearer picture of how the people of Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh view their political future under the new administrative arrangements. For the Modi government, this will be an opportunity to prove that its policies have indeed brought stability and progress. But the regional parties, especially the Gupkar Alliance, will argue that Kashmir’s unique identity and needs have been overlooked in the name of national unity.


In Ladakh, the question of the Sixth Schedule will continue to loom large, with the government needing to strike a delicate balance between granting enough autonomy to assuage local concerns and avoiding the perception that it is backtracking on its promise of uniformity. For the people of Ladakh, the elections will be as much about ensuring their cultural and economic security as it will be about political representation.

Ultimately, the Jammu and Kashmir elections will be a litmus test for how deeply the region has been integrated into the Indian Union post Article 370, and whether the promises of development and peace have materialized in a meaningful way.


Comments


bottom of page